The long-awaited successor to one of the best-selling synths of the century updates the formula with more polyphony and new sound engines, though the landscape it enters is far more crowded.
When Korg released the original MicroKorg in 2002, it did something most synths never do: it became a genuine mass-market object. Hundreds of thousands of units moved over two decades, not because the architecture was groundbreaking—it largely repackaged the MS-2000 engine—but because it got the basics right. It was cheap, portable, and loaded with genre-sorted presets that sounded good quickly. The fiddly matrix programming was a price many were willing to pay.
The MicroKorg 2, launched this year, tries to recapture that lightning. It is still a virtual analogue synth, but now its oscillators also handle additive synthesis and PCM samples. Polyphony jumps from four voices to eight, and the instrument can run two patches at once in a bi-timbral setup—practical for layering a bassline with a vocoder part, for instance. The gooseneck microphone returns, now paired with harmonizer and hard-tuning vocal effects. A clear screen and a built-in loop recorder are the most straightforward workflow upgrades.
What holds it back from a repeat cultural takeover has less to do with the hardware itself and more with the world around it. The synth market is no longer starved for affordable, compact instruments. The MicroKorg’s original dominance relied on a vacuum; today, competitors at similar prices offer deeper synthesis, better keybeds, and aftertouch—the MicroKorg 2 has none. Its genre-based patch categories, once a clever shortcut, now read as slightly dated alongside tools that assume users want to build sounds from scratch. The vocal processing feels more like a novelty than a necessity.
None of this makes the MicroKorg 2 a bad instrument. For anyone seeking an immediate, versatile synth with a clear lineage, it does its job. But where the first model became a fixture of bedrooms, stages, and studios almost by default, this one arrives as a sensible option among many. Icon status isn’t repeated by spec sheet alone.
Join the Club
Like this story? You’ll love our monthly newsletter.
Thank you for subscribing to the newsletter.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.






