Trump’s financial disclosure lays bare the earnings from a critically condemned Melania film and meme-coin empire, drawing a straight line between political office and personal profit.
Among the more glaring entries in Donald Trump’s latest financial disclosure: a $10.7 million licensing payment from Amazon MGM Studios for Melania, the Brett Ratner–directed documentary that arrived in theaters this January to near-unanimous derision. The 927-page filing, released Tuesday by the US Office of Government Ethics, also lists an additional $521,161 in licensing income from the First Lady’s memoir and roughly $6 million from NFTs and related collectibles, placing the Trump brand at the center of a digital merchandise push tied directly to the presidency.
Amazon reportedly paid $40 million for the film’s rights after a post-election bidding war that followed a Mar-a-Lago meeting between Jeff Bezos and the Trumps. The company sunk an estimated $75 million into acquisition and marketing, yet the documentary grossed just $16.7 million worldwide in its theatrical run. It currently holds a 7% critics’ score on Rotten Tomatoes, with Consequence awarding it an F and describing the project as a tightly controlled exercise in image management that offered no genuine access.
The disclosure also reveals over $1.4 billion in cryptocurrency-related income through ventures like World Liberty Financial and the $TRUMP meme coin, pushing the president’s reported annual revenue past $2 billion. When asked whether he was profiting from the office, Trump replied that “everybody is profiting” because the stock market is up, adding: “I don’t know if I had a better career in politics or business.” The numbers suggest politics.
The Melania licensing fee is a small fraction of the total, but its appearance in an official ethics filing normalizes the blur between public office and private enterprise. Amazon’s deep investment in a project critics dismissed as a glossy hagiography recasts the relationship between a sitting president and a corporate giant as a straightforward content deal. That the documentary failed to connect with audiences while generating a multimillion-dollar windfall for its subject only sharpens the point.
Join the Club
Like this story? You’ll love our monthly newsletter.
Thank you for subscribing to the newsletter.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.






